![late 2012 mac mini vs 2011 mac mini geebench late 2012 mac mini vs 2011 mac mini geebench](https://http2.mlstatic.com/macbook-2008-13-D_NQ_NP_554015-MLM25213619711_122016-F.jpg)
Today’s best Mac mini scored 3363 points in single-core mode, and 7208 points in multi-core mode.
![late 2012 mac mini vs 2011 mac mini geebench late 2012 mac mini vs 2011 mac mini geebench](https://s.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/11/dsc04602-1352479050.jpg)
LATE 2012 MAC MINI VS 2011 MAC MINI GEEBENCH SERIES
The application feeds a computer a series of difficult sums to work upon, such as cryptographic routines, lossless file compression/decompression, ditto for JPEG and PNG graphics, blur/sharpen filters and some Mandelbrot fractal crunching. The first test is the cross-platform Geekbench 3, which measures raw processor and memory performance. Mac mini launched in 2005 it has developed a cult following from delighted owners who have found the little chap capable of so much more. That’s fine for people working to the tightest budgets who don’t require more computing power than is necessary for office duties and some modest creative work. MacBook Air, albeit working much slower due to the little mini’s reliance on a hard disk rather than solid-state flash storage. Inside this new starter model is effectively the same computer as a Mac mini (Late 2014) 1.4 GHz review] there was the distraction of finding the price slashed by one-fifth, from £499 to £399, to sweeten the deal. Read:Ģ014 Mac mini v 2012 Mac mini comparison review and our Today’s 2014 Mac mini range is in many respects slower than the 2012 range it replaces. That’s exactly what’s happened with Apple’s 2014 model of the Mac mini though. Particularly when there’s been not one but two long years between the now-obsolete and shiny new editions. However one thing we don’t ordinarily expect is for a newly revised computer to appear which computes more slower than the model that it replaces. The adage about steps forward and backward really comes to mind for the new Mac mini, and your personal needs will suggest how many this one’s taken in each direction. In its favour, system IO has increased in other areas through the implementation of faster storage drives, improved Wi-Fi and more focused Thunderbolt 2 technology. And despite Intel’s advances in faster processing at lower clock speeds, the 2014 generation does suffer in out-and-out multi-threaded speed when compared to the quad-core Mac minis made two years earlier – it may come as little surprise that two cores still comfortably beat four. For single-threaded applications, the processor performance is little changed, even though we expected the 0.2 GHz advantage to give this model an unequivocal edge. Expensive compared to previous 2012 model, with price increasing again in late 2016įor power users that need that extra processing headroom, the quad-core Mac mini is already sorely missed.Top Mac mini has less than half the processor performance of previous model.